Legal Opinion

Olivares v. Dason (In re Dason)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided June 18, 2018No. Case No.: 6:16-bk-11635-MH; Adv. No.: 6:16-ap-01211-MHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mark Houle, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 26, 2016, Sam & Greeta Dason (Sam, individually, "Dason") (collectively, "Debtors") filed a Chapter 7 voluntary petition. On August 22, 2016, Juddy Olivares & Eric Panitz (individually, "Olivares" and "Panitz") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a complaint against Dason to determine dischargeability of debt ( 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) ) and for attorney's fees. On September 20, 2016, the complaint was amended. On January 11, 2017, the Court dismissed Panitz from the complaint. On March 7, 2017, Olivares filed her…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Law Office of Andrew S. Bisom v. HowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2020