Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical Progress
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND STRIKE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 78, 79, 81, 86, 87
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint alleges that defendants created a complex criminal enterprise involving fake companies, fake identifications, and large-scale illegal taping of reproductive health care conferences and private meetings in order to advance their goal of interfering with women’s access to legal abortion. FAC (Dkt. No. 59) ¶ l.1 Defendants move to *817dismiss the FAC, arguing that plaintiffs failed to adequately allege facts supporting their fifteen claims for…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Democracy Partners v. Project Veritas Action FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Amjad Fseisi v. O’Keefe Media Group, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
- Democracy Partners, LLC v. Project Veritas Action FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Democracy Partners, LLC v. Project Veritas Action FundDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Kiley Krzyzek, et al. v. OpenX Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.