Legal Opinion

Fick v. Dairyland Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 1979No. A7706-09238, CA 12194PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.

This was an action on an automobile liability insurance policy. Plaintiff insurance company appeals from a judgment denying it attorney fees.

Howard Fick was injured in an automobile collision by the negligent driving of Laura Hay, who was insured under her parents’ policy issued by Dairyland Insurance Company. Fick sued Hay and her parents and obtained a judgment for $3,750 and costs. Dairy-land refused to pay any part of that judgment. Fick meanwhile was compensated by his insurer Progressive Insurance Company in the amount of the judgment, presumably under the uninsured motorist coverage.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Heis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Wood Et Ux v. Baker Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Spectra Novae, Ltd. v. Waker Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API