Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 2010No. 030403995; A129974PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Plaintiffs and defendants issued various insurance policies to a common insured, Zidell, 1 which operated a scrapping business along the Willamette River. Zidell later became the target of an environmental cleanup action and eventually filed claims against its insurers, including plaintiffs and defendants, seeking a declaration of coverage related to the cleanup action, as well as reimbursement for defense and indemnity costs already incurred. Defendants settled with Zidell and were dismissed from the case. Plaintiffs, meanwhile, proceeded to trial, and the court entered a judgment in…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson Brothers, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine InsurCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Nucor Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Allianz Global Risks v. ACE Property & Casualty Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Potomac Ins. v. Pennsylvania Mfrs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London & Excess Insurance v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API