Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 2, 1931No. 6 Div. 667PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for compensation as a widow of the employee, and there was judgment for the petitioner. The pleading consisted merely of the petition and answer.

The defendant insists there is no legal evidence authorizing the conclusion of the trial court that the deceased husband, when shot, was (1) acting within the line and scope of his employment; (2) or, if so, that the work he was performing at the time and place broug'ht him and petitioner within the influence of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59).

Deceased was, for some time prior to and at his death,, employed by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Di DonatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Gus Mayer Co. v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. N.J.J. v. Wesfam Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API