Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Di Donato

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1921No. 297PublishedCited by 69 opinions

CERTIORARI to the supreme court or the state or PENNSYLVANIA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna

Certiorari directed to the review of a judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, affirming a judgment of the Court of Common. Pleas of the County of Philadelphia, which affirmed • an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board of the State of Pennsylvania, allowed respondent, as widow of Pasquale Di Donato who, in the course of his employment by the Railway Company, was killed. Her petition was presented in the legal course to the Board, and assigned for an investigation to a referee who reported an award in accordance with it.

The Company prosecuted an appeal to the Board which affirmed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. New Mexico Public Service Co. v. EngelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. of Hardinsburg v. Atchison, T. & S. F. RY. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Lorenzetti v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1942

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API