Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Fertilizer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to have certain deeds and deeds of trust described in the complaint adjudged void and set aside as against the plaintiffs, to the end that the plaintiffs may redeem the land which they had conveyed by a deed of trust to J. H. LeRoy, trustee, to secure their note to the defendant Albemarle Fertilizer Company, Inc., and for other relief.

The facts shown by the evidence at the trial are as follows:

On 19 April, 1910, J. C. Meekins, Sr., by a deed which was duly recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Tyrrell County, conveyed to the plaintiff Ellen Hill, wife of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Hinton v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Swindell v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Foust v. Gate City Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. In Re Foreclosure of RegisterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API