Legal Opinion

Lockridge v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

The first question involved as stated by plaintiff, is as follows: “If the attorney and agent who acts for the trustee to sell property sells to himself, as the record in this case discloses was done, does the deed of the trustee conveying the property to his attorney and agent pass the equitable interest of the mortgagor?” We think not, if nothing else appeared.

We think the principle of law relied on by the referee, sound in principle and the law of this jurisdiction as set forth in Gibson v. Barbour, 100 N. C., 192 (197-198) : “‘It is an inflexible rule/ are the words of the late Chief…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Froneberger v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Joyner v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Hayes v. PaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Davis v. . DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Hinton v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Elkes v. Interstate Trustee Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Hill v. . Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API