Legal Opinion
The Irving
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 F.Supp. 59 (1940)
THE IRVING.
UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO.
v.
CONNERS MARINE CO., Inc.
District Court, S. D. New York.
February 21, 1940.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (F. Herbert Prem, of New York City, of counsel), for libellant.
Purdy & Lamb, of New York City (John E. Purdy, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant and respondent.
HULBERT, District Judge.
This is a suit in Admiralty. Claimant-respondent raises a novel question by its belated motion to amend its answer, seeking thereby to invoke the benefits of the Limitation of Liability statutes, 46 U.S. C.A. § 181 et seq.
Libel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Steamship Co. v. MountSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc. v. Travelers Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- The Grasselli Chemical Co. No. 4.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- The IrvingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- The ChickieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Tankers v. Steamtug Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- The BrightDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
- Cantey v. McLain Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Petition of American MARC, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.