Legal Opinion
Cantey v. McLain Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 24, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Respondents ask leave to file an amended answer to the amended libel by adding a defense of limitation of liability under Sections 4282, 4283, 4284 and 4286 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, Sections 182, 183, 184 and 186 of Title 46, U.S.C.A., in a suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Libellant opposes on the ground that more than six months have expired since the claim was filed.
The original libel was filed November 16, 1938. An amended libel was filed June 19, 1939. To the latter, respondents filed exceptions which, on January 19, 1940, were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc. v. Travelers Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- The Grasselli Chemical Co. No. 4.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- The Quarrington CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The ChickieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Tankers v. Steamtug Long BranchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Petition of American MARC, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
- Moran Towing & Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Wong v. Utah Home Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.