Legal Opinion

Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 3, 2000No. 98-1085, 98-1093 and 98-1154PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

This appeal and cross appeal arise from an employment discrimination action brought under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Defendants Sprint/United Management Company (“Sprint”) and various individuals. Judgment was entered against Sprint,, but in favor of the individual defendants. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for a new trial.

Background

Plaintiff Andrea Heno is a woman of mixed racial background (Creole and other) who principally identifies herself as a black person. In March 1991, she began work as a sales representative in Sprint’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Ofelia Randle v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  3. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Lounds v. Lincare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Somoza v. University of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API