Legal Opinion
Ball v. Renner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1995No. 94-8064PublishedCited by 173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Sharon Ball (“Ball”) initially sued her former employer City of Cheyenne (“Cheyenne”) and its then Sergeant David Renner (“Renner”). Because Ball has not appealed the district court’s entry of summary judgment in Cheyenne’s favor on the claims that she had advanced against it, we deal only with the action as between Ball and Renner.
In that respect Ball asserted two claims against Renner: one charging sexual harassment, actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII,” 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-171), and the other a Wyoming state law claim…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Karen Williams v. Bruce BanningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Brooks v. GaenzleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.