Legal Opinion
Pappas v. Town of Enfield
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 7, 2014No. 3:08-CV-250(CSH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Margaret R. Pappas, owner of a parcel of land in the Town of Enfield, brought this action against the Town of Enfield, Town of Enfield Planning and Zoning Commission (“Enfield’s PZC” or “PZC”), and four Commissioners, Anthony DiPace, Jeffrey D. Cooper, James A. Hickey, Jr., and Karen A. Weseliza, in their official and individual capacities.
Pappas alleges that a subdivision application she submitted to Enfield’s PZC was improperly denied in violation of her Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of MineolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Clubside, Inc. v. ValentinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Komondy v. GiocoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Blinkoff v. TorringtonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Cavienss v. Norwak TransitDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Handsome, Inc. v. MonroeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Horelick v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.