Legal Opinion

Handsome, Inc. v. Monroe

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 2023No. 3:11-cv-01288Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT HANDSOME, INC., et al. : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Case No. 3:11-CV-1288(RNC) : TOWN OF MONROE, et al., : : Defendants. : RULING AND ORDER Handsome, Inc. (“Handsome”) and its officers, Todd and Mona Cascella, bring this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against the Town of Monroe (the “Town”), the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town (the “Commission”), and former Town officials, seeking damages allegedly caused by the Commission’s handling of Handsome’s request for an extension of a special permit. The third amended complaint claims that the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API