Legal Opinion
Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of Mineola
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 16, 2001No. 2001PublishedCited by 608 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Harlen Associates (Harlen), brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants-appel-lees, the Incorporated Village of Mineóla (Village) and its Board of Trustees (Board), alleging that the Board’s denial of a special use permit to operate a convenience store was unconstitutional. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mishler, /., granted defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. Harlen contends that the Board’s denial of the special use permit was unconstitutional…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by608 opinions
- David Giordano v. City of New York, Howard Safir, Police Commissioner, New York City Police Department, Medical Board, Police Pension Fund, Article IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Hu v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Clubside, Inc. v. ValentinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Lanning v. City of Glens FallsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Charles M. McDonald v. Village of Winnetka, Ronald Colpaert, Scott Smith and Mitchell S. KushnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
603 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.