Allsopp v. Joshua Hendy Machine Works
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial, and from an order refusing to retax costs. M. C. Sloss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The complaint alleges that on or about June 17, 1897, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract whereby the defendant agreed to sell to the plaintiff a five-stamp mill with certain accessories for the sum of $5,000; that thereafter by agreement the price was increased to $5,050; that thereafter, on or about the twenty-third day of September, A. D. 1897, the defendant offered to deliver the said property to the plaintiff and he accepted the said offer, and thereupon he paid defendant the sum of $5,050. There is no denial of these allegations. It is further alleged that on or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Burke v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lowe v. OzmunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Taber v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.