Legal Opinion

Clark v. KMart Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2002No. Docket 212749PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Jansen and Whttbeck, JJ.

O’Connell, RJ. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court following its review of our previous opinion in this case, Clark v Kmart Corp, 242 Mich App 137; 617 NW2d 729 (2000) (Clark I). Our Supreme Court reversed and remanded with instructions that we address defendant’s claims of instructional error. Clark v Kmart Corp, 465 Mich 416; 634 NW2d 347 (2001) (Clark II). On remand, we affirm.

We articulated the pertinent facts underlying this appeal in our previous opinion:

[P]laintiff Annie Clark and her husband, plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Case v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Johnson v. CorbetMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Murdock v. HigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Brenner v. KolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Quinto v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Tanya Wimberly v. Forman Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Foust v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  5. Nejo v. Tamaroff Buick Honda Isuzu NissanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API