Legal Opinion
Nejo v. Tamaroff Buick Honda Isuzu Nissan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2004No. 02-1794PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
In this diversity case under Michigan law, plaintiff Olukayode O. Nejo appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, which followed a special jury verdict for the defense on the ground of no negligence. On January 4, 1999, Mr. Nejo left the dealership of defendant Tamaroff Buick Honda Isuzu Nissan, where he had *882just had his SUV’s tires rotated. Shortly thereafter, Nejo’s vehicle was found by the side of the road with its right front wheel off. Nejo sued Tamaroff for negligence, claiming that the wheel flew off as he drove, causing him to lose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- J.C. Wyckoff & Associates, Inc. v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Gerald L. Anchor and Hazel B. Anchor v. Dennis M. O'TOOle and Melinda L. O'TOOleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- King v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Brenner v. KolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- One Beacon Insurance v. Broadcast Development Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. Landmark of Iroquois Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025