Legal Opinion

Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1995No. 1994-0115PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 679.] HORTON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HARWICK CHEMICAL CORPORATION; A.W. CHESTERTON ET AL., APPELLEES. ROBERT DERRICK, APPELLANT v. JOHN CRANE, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp.,

1995-Ohio-286.] Civil procedure—Appropriate summary judgment standard for proving causation in asbestos cases—Torts—Alternative liability cannot apply, when. 1. For each defendant in a multidefendant asbestos case, the plaintiff has the burden of proving exposure to the defendant’s product and that the product was a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Horton v. Harwick Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
  5. C. A. Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ackison v. Anchor Packing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Miller v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Emerson Family Ltd. Partnership v. Emerson Tool, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API