Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to certain merchandise that was assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem, under the provision *155in paragraph 1506 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, for “Brushes, not specially provided for (except paint brushes).” Although several claims are made in the protest, the one on which plaintiff relies is for classification under the residuary provision of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for articles, composed wholly or in chief value of steel, not specially…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SchadeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Nestle-Lemur Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970