Legal Opinion

Nestle-Lemur Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 29, 1956No. C. D. 1825PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “Polyethylene Brush Caps with Bristles” and was classified by the collector of customs under the provision in paragraph 1506 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for—

*210* * * all other brushes, not specially provided for, * * *

with duty assessment at 50 per centum ad valorem. Both directly and by similitude under the provisions of paragraph 1559, the claim is made for duty at the rate of 12% per centum or 17% per centum under paragraph 390 of the said act, as modified by the Presidential proclamation relating to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nevin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kaysons Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Freni v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Jarrell-Ash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. E. M. Stevens Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API