Legal Opinion

In Re Albori

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1933No. Docket No. Crim. 3639PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE, J., pro tem.

Petitioner, an inmate of the state prison at San Quentin, seeks his release on habeas corpus.

The facts are not in dispute. No return to the writ was filed herein, but it was stipulated upon the hearing “that the allegations of fact set forth in the petition are true; that the petition may stand as a return to the writ and also as a traverse thereto”. It appears that petitioner was convicted on two charges of assault with a deadly weapon. For each of said offenses he was sentenced to be confined in the state prison at San Quentin for the term prescribed by law and he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ex Parte CliftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re KepfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re BineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People ex rel. Brown v. JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API