Legal Opinion

In Re Cowen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1946No. Crim. 4668PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Petitioner, who is confined in the State Prison at Folsom, urges that his imprisonment is unlawful in that his term, with credits, has expired, and that the Adult Authority has exceeded its power by purporting to forfeit time credits earned by and allowed to petitioner and by redetermining the length of time of his imprisonment. We have concluded, for reasons hereinafter delineated, that petitioner is not unlawfully imprisoned and that the authority has not exceeded its power.

On May 19, 1930, petitioner was adjudged guilty, in action number 39224 in the Los Angeles Superior Court, of an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. McNabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. WingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API