Legal Opinion

In Re Byrnes

California Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1948No. Crim. 4932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner, who is confined in the State Prison at San Quentin, seek's his release on the ground that he has completed his term of lawful imprisonment. While the record does not sustain his position in that regard, nevertheless it does appear appropriate that the Adult Authority should reconsider the propriety of his continued confinement in the light of subsequent events as will hereinafter be delineated.

Following two trials in 1932—one in July and the other a month later—petitioner was convicted on seven counts, divisible three on the first trial and four on the second. The indictment in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. In Re ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re CowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. ByrnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. In Re AlboriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. SavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. In Re HaygoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API