Legal Opinion

In Re Kepford

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1933No. Docket No. Crim. 3606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus.

Under an information filed by the district attorney of San Joaquin County, petitioner was charged with and convicted of" a felony, to wit, driving an automobile without the consent of the owner in violation of section 146 of the California Vehicle Act. Petitioner was also charged with and plead guilty to two prior felony convictions. He was sentenced to imprisonment in Folsom state prison for the indeterminate period prescribed .by law, being received at the prison on June 15, 1928. Thereafter the prison board fixed his definite term of incarceration at…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re AlboriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re FontinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. In Matter of HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. In re HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API