Legal Opinion
Board of Education v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1974No. Docket 14220PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
Defendants Michigan Bell Telephone Company and Detroit Edison were reimbursed for the cost of relocating utility equipment occasioned by a Detroit School District building program. Plaintiff Board of Education of the Detroit School District does not believe they should be required to compensate defendants for expenses incurred in accommodating the physical expansion of the Bellevue School system. We think otherwise.
In July 1962, the Detroit School District petitioned the Wayne County Circuit Court requesting that certain plats and an alley be vacated to permit construction of an addition to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Attorney General ex rel. Kies v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Bowler v. NagelMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- School District No. 4 v. GageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Capital Area District Library v. Michigan Open Carry, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Curtis v. VlothoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Pontiac v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- DETROIT BD. OF. ED. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Consumers Power Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.