Legal Opinion
MTR. OF CONS. EDISON CO. v. Lindsay
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 10, 1969PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge Fuld.
These two proceedings arise out of the decision of. the City of New York, the appellant on these appeals, to condemn (1) an area of several blocks in lower Manhattan near the Brooklyn Bridge for urban renewal purposes and (2.) two blocks in the south Bronx for the purpose of building a public school on the site. In each proceeding, the Consolidated Edison Company (Con Ed) sought compensation for damages resulting from its being required to remove and relocate its pipes, mains, and conduits from the beds of the streets in the condemned areas. Since each case was initiated by a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Orleans Gas Light Co. v. Drainage Commission of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- New York Telephone Co. v. City of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. SanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Center Line v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
- County of Nassau v. South Farmingdale Water DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.