Legal Opinion

Montes v. Pendergrass

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 25, 2001No. 04-00-00788-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Heldiza Montes and Dinorah Montes (the “Monteses”) appeal the trial court’s summary judgment that was granted in favor of the appellees, Paul Dean Pender-grass (“Pendergrass”) and K-Bar Services, Inc. (“K-Bar”). The Monteses assert two points of error in their brief, contending that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether the negligence of Alan Montes was the sole proximate cause of the collision and whether Pendergrass was negligent. We affirm the trial court’s summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Moore v. K Mart Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Lynch v. RickettsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Praesel v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Murray v. Ford Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
  2. Lazaro Reyes Ciguero, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Jesus Reyes Ricardez v. Jose Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  3. Fred Villanova v. FDIC as Receiver for Home Savings of America, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  4. Davis v. Fisk Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. VIA Metropolitan Transit v. Gerald Anthony Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API