Legal Opinion
Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided January 12, 2006No. 14-04-00790-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE BROCK YATES, Justice.
Appellant Donald Davis sued appellees Fisk Electric Company, Fisk Technologies, and Fisk Management Inc. (“Fisk”) for wrongful termination, alleging that his termination was based on race. A jury found that race was not a motivating factor in Davis’s termination. In five issues, Davis complains that (1) the trial court erred in overruling Davis’s objections to Fisk’s peremptory strikes on the basis that they were exercised in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (2-3) the evidence is legally and factually…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- West Telemarketing Corp. Outbound v. McClure, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2006
- State v. Central Expressway Sign Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
- Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Davis v. Fisk Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.