Legal Opinion

Praesel v. Johnson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1998No. 96-0584PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, SPECTOR, BAKER, ABBOTT, and HANKINSON, Justices, join., We must decide in this case whether a physician owes a duty to third parties to warn an epileptic patient not to drive or to report the patient’s condition to state authorities that govern the issuance of drivers’ licenses. We conclude that we should not impose a duty that is owed to third parties and accordingly reverse the judgment of the court of appeals in part and render judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing.

I

Ronald Peterson, an epileptic, suffered a grand mal seizure while…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. EscotoTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Van Horn v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Deleese Allen v. Walmart Stores, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Perry v. S.N.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API