Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ford Motor Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided February 18, 2003No. 05-02-00866-CVPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

This is a subrogation claim. Walter and Magnolia Murray brought this action on behalf of State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company (State Farm) against Ford Motor Company to recover amounts paid to them by State Farm. The trial judge granted Ford’s motion for summary judgment based upon the economic loss doctrine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause to the trial court.

Facts

At 1:00 a.m. on July 3, 2000, a neighbor knocked on Walter Murray’s apartment door to let him know his Ford pickup truck was on fire.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. lan/stv, a Joint Venture of Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. and Stv Incorporated v. Martin K. Eby Construction Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Pugh v. General Terrazzo Supplies, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  3. Beyer Properties, L.L.C. v. Jerry Huffman Custom Builder, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Thomas v. Omar Investments, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  5. City of Alton v. Sharyland Water Supply Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API