Legal Opinion

Universal Shipping Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 23, 1913No. 1030PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal hum Board of TJnited States General Appraisers, Abstract 29817'(T. D. 32830).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The importation involved in this appeal consists of certain merchandise cut from aluminum sheets into what are generally included under the term “blanks,” and in two forms, one square and the other *246cut in the form of a circle. They were assessed for duty under paragraph 172 as sheets of aluminum. The paragraph provides for “aluminum * * * in plates, sheets, bars, and rods, eleven cents per pound.” The claim the importers made before the board, and which is made here, is that the articles should have been assessed under paragraph 199 as articles composed of aluminum partly or wholly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Newman-Andrew Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seligmann v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. F. H. Paul & Stein Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Sommers Plastic Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API