John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This action involves the proper tariff classification of articles imported in 1972 from Canada via the port of Detroit that were described on the special customs invoice as cold formed side rails, and on the consumption entry as parts for railway cars.
The goods were manufactured by Canadian Metal Soiling Mills, Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario (hereafter referred to as “Canadian Mills”) and imported by ACF Industries, AMCAR Division, Huntington, West Virginia (hereafter referred to as “Amcar”). The plaintiff, John V. Carr & Son, Inc., is a customs broker, agent and attorney in fact…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,949 J. William Wolf, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Robert R. Frank, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Commercial Shearing & Stamping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- PISTORINO & COMPANY, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- American Mannex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cummins Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Avins Industrial Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- E. R. Hawthorne & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Overton & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
- Sandvik Steel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.