Legal Opinion

Overton & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 23, 1980No. C.D. 4875; Court No. 77-6-01002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Newman, Judge:

The issue in this case concerns the proper tariff classification for certain imported steel products described on the commercial invoice included in the official entry documents as ‘ Hot Rolled Sectional Steel, alloyed, not annealed, our brand ‘65 EN 2 G’, acc. to AISI 8665, Profile D-84555, in bars of 89K" with shorts max. 5%, Tol. our no. 567, ends sawn”. The subject merchandise was exported from West Germany and entered at the Port of New York in 1975. Plaintiff, a customhouse broker, entered the merchandise for the account of Wetherell Bros. Co., the ultimate consignee.

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bendix Mouldings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  3. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  2. Terumo-America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API