Legal Opinion

Hatupin v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1944No. 29317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Though buried in a record which is overburdened with evidence on collateral matters and which is replete with innuendo, charge, and countercharge, the controlling facts in this controversy are quite simple and not much in dispute.

One Emil Pohl owned a second mortgage on property in Seattle known as the Alvena Vista apartments. August 11, 1938, he deposited the mortgage, with an assignment of it and the note which it secured, with Lawyers & Realtors Title Insurance Company under the following directions:

“You are authorized and directed to deliver said instruments ... to John Hatupin or order,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dane v. DanielWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlexanderWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Curley Elec., Inc. v. BillsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Curley Electric, Inc. v. BillsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Bloomer v. Southwest Washington Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Harvey v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API