Curley Electric, Inc. v. Bills
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*116¶1
Grosse, J.
— With respect to real estate, under the Washington Revised Uniform Partnership Act, chapter 25.05 RCW (RUPA) the question of whether the owners intend to form a partnership is one of fact. The burden of proving the existence of a partnership rests on the party alleging it, and its existence depends on the intention of the parties and the totality of the circumstances. Here, after a hearing on contested evidence, the trial court determined that Joseph Bills and James Teply entered into a partnership with respect to their real estate. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 On July 8, 1992, Joseph Bills…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Barnes v. McLendonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Seafirst Center Ltd. Partnership v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Eder v. ReddickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Simpson v. ThorslundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Simpson v. ThorslundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Dale Carey v. Matthew BumsteadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019