Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
This case has been here before and is reported 232 Mich. 538. The facts are there stated, and we restate only sufficient to point the course of decision. Plaintiff brought this suit, claiming that, in reliance upon defendant’s performance of its duty as a common carrier under the common law and State statutes declaratory thereof, recognized by its, own rules and regulations and supplemented by repeated assurances of its local agent that it was ready and able to perform its duty, plaintiff purchased potatoes and filled its warehouses at Falmouth on defendant’s line of railroad in Missaukee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. of EmbdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLemore v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Rockwell v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933