Legal Opinion

Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1925No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff is a co-operative marketing association, composed of 300 members. It does business at Falmouth, where it has three large warehouses. Falmouth is situate on one of defendant’s branch lines, and has only one railway. In the fall of 1922 plaintiff could not get cars, as agreed, to move to market the potatoes it had purchased, and brought this suit to recover its damage. The jury awarded plaintiff $15,379.59.

Falmouth and vicinity appears to be engaged largely in potato raising, and for several years plaintiff has purchased and shipped large quantities to market over defendant’s line. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MaucherSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Eastern R. Co. of NM v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Close v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HardimanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API