Legal Opinion

McLemore v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.

"What duty does a common carrier owe under the Federal Transportation Act to a shipper with reference to cars and loading facilities ?

The watermelons which the plaintiff shipped were transported from Wade, North Carolina, to Philadelphia, Pa. Such shipment constituted interstate commerce. The melons which plaintiff proposed to ship were also intended to be transported to the same point. The Federal Transportation Act, paragraph 1, subsection 2, U. S. C. A., page 52, imposes upon every common carrier “engaged in the transportation ... of property to provide and furnish such transportation upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Davis v. CornwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Davis v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. ValanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Falmouth Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pinehurst Peach Co. v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API