Legal Opinion

Sundance v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1986No. L.A. 31785PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.*

This action, filed by four public inebriates and one taxpayer, challenges California’s drunk in public statute (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (f)1) on numerous Eighth Amendment and due process grounds.2 Plaintiffs seek an order enjoining enforcement of section 647(f) in light of many alleged constitutional abuses attendant upon enforcement of the statute in Los Angeles County. They also seek an order mandating referral of all public inebriates to civil detoxification centers in lieu of criminal prosecution. (See § 647, subd. (ff).)3 Finally, plaintiffs argue that section 647(f)…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Coshow v. City of EscondidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Sundance v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. CHIATELLO v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. People v. BrighamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API