Marin Municipal Water District v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRattigan, J.
This appeal involves the pleading of rights and duties incident to subjacent support of land, and a determination—apparently not heretofore made by an appellate court—of whether the common law rule of subjacent support has been modified by statute in California.
Appellant, plaintiff below and herein called “district,” owned a public water system which included two pipe mains installed in the land surface on the crest of a hill. Respondent (herein “railroad”) owned a railroad tunnel which ran through the hill beneath the district’s mains. The tunnel collapsed, whereupon the surface land above…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Luthringer v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Gonzales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Veterans' Welfare Board v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Conlin v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Platts v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cifre v. Daas Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Breeding v. Koch Carbon, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1989
- Quinn v. CoultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026