Legal Opinion

Platts v. Sacramento Northern Railway

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1988No. A038279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

A former owner of an underground tunnel easement who removed subjacent support from the surface land may be liable for property damage to the surface owner even after the owner transfers the property. Plaintiff, however, has failed to produce any declarations or facts to refute defendant Sacramento Northern Railway’s showing that it did not remove any subjacent support. We affirm the summary judgment.

Robert G. Platts sued defendant Sacramento Northern Railway (Northern) and the State of California for the destruction of his house allegedly caused when an abandoned railroad…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Preston v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Keene v. WigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Saatzer v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flowmaster, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Vecchio v. PinkusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Flowmaster, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Quinn v. CoultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API