Legal Opinion
Cavalieri-Conway v. L. Butterman & Associates
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 28, 1998No. 96 C 5631PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted and Plaintiffs motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
As a preliminary matter, the undisputed facts for this opinion are taken from the court’s reconciliation of the parties’ Local Rule 12(M) and 12(N) statements. See Bra-sic v. Heinemann’s Inc., 121 F.3d 281, 284 (7th Cir.1997) (discussing Local Rule 12(M) and 12(N)); Huff v. UARCO, 122 F.3d 374, 382-83 (7th Cir.1997) (same). In addition, to the extent that they are consistent with these statements,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Patricia D. Rush v. McDonald Corporation, Sharon Funston, and William R. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Texas v. Crest Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- United States v. HyltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Villas West II of Willowridge v. McGlothinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Stevens v. Hollywood Towers & Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- American National General Insurance v. L.T. JacksonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.