Legal Opinion

Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 2005No. CIV.A. 05-1266PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Henkel Corporation (“plaintiff’ or “Henkel”) initiated the instant action on behalf of Loctite Corporation (“Loctite”) as Loctite’s successor. Henkel seeks insurance coverage from defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“defendant Hartford”) and defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“defendant Liberty”) for the defense and indemnity costs that have incurred, and that will continue to incur, in connection with asbestos personal injury lawsuits filed by claimants who have allegedly been exposed to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Genaeya Corp. v. Harco National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Gorton v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  4. In Re Helicopter Crash Near Weaverville, Ca 8/5/08District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  5. Pierce Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API