Legal Opinion
Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The defendant issued a policy insuring against loss from liability for the operation of an automobile of Martin Preneta. A provision of the policy made the insurance available to any person lawfully operating the car “with the permission of the named assured.” While it was being driven by Vincent Pozucek it struck and killed the plaintiff’s intestate, a judgment therefor was obtained by the plaintiff against Pozucek which has not been paid, and this action was brought to recover the amount from the insurer.
The record indicates that upon the trial as well as upon this appeal the contested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Odden v. Union Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Fullerton v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hinton v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Keithan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Rinaldi v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.