Haynes v. Seiler

The present controversy arose from a four-car rear-end collision involving plaintiffs in the third car and defendant Seiler in the fourth. The first and second cars stopped beyond the crest of a hill, the first preparing to turn left. Shortly after plaintiffs collided with the stationary cars, the vehicle owned by defendant Ford Motor Company and operated by defendant Seiler struck the rear of plaintiffs’ vehicle. Plaintiffs’ circuit court action for dámages against defendant ended in a jury verdict of, ho cause of action. Alleged procedural errors during the trial provide the basis for the…