Thaut v. Finley
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing
McGregor, J.
The recent decision of another panel of this Court, in Lover v Sampson, 44 Mich App 173; 205 NW2d 69 (1972), occasions our grant of plaintiffs application for rehearing in the instant case. The patent conflict between the holding in Lover and our opinion in this matter compels us to reconsider our decision.
In Lover, the Court held that defendants, not subject to strict liability under the dramshop act 1 because not "engaged in the business of selling alcoholic beverages”, 2 may be liable for furnishing alcoholic beverages in violation of other penal statutes regulating…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abendschein v. FarrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Douglas v. Edgewater Park Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Hardaway v. Consolidated Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Lover v. SampsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Jones v. BourrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. MaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Grayson Fraternal Order of Eagles, Aerie No. 3738, Inc. v. ClaywellKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.