Legal Opinion

Pioneer Utilities Corporation v. Scott-Newcomb, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 14, 1939No. Civ. 182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

On the removal of this action, which was commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to this court, the defendant appearing specially moves for an order vacating and setting aside the service of a summons on the ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation, not transacting business in the State of New York or within the jurisdiction of this court.

The summons with notice of demand for judgment was served upon Joseph P. Feeley, vice president and general manager of the defendant, on July 1, 1938. On July 11, 1938 the defendant moved for an order vacating the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. McKibbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Zuckerman v. McCulleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1947
  3. Hinchcliffe Motors, Inc. v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  4. Wingert v. Navarie Aznar, S. A. BilbaoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1961
  5. Bage, LLC v. Southeastern Roofing Co. of Spartanburg, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API