Legal Opinion

Roche v. Young Bros., Inc. of Florence

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 8, 1993No. 2087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default judgment entered against the appellant, Young Brothers, Inc. d/b/a Days Inn East (Days Inn), and in favor of the respondent, George J. Roche (Roche), in the amount of $45,000. Days Inn argues that Roche’s service of process was defective and, alternatively, that the failure of Days Inn to answer was due to excusable neglect, mistake or inadvertence. We agree that service of process was never perfected and therefore reverse.

Roche, a New York resident, allegedly suffered injuries March 19, 1990 after falling…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandy v. American Laundry MacHinery Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Richardson Construction Co. v. Meek Engineering & Construction Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Hamilton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. McGirt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. Able v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Langley v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Langley v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Roche v. Young Bro's.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API