Legal Opinion
Hardin v. Farris
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1974No. 1374PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court, by granting the motion, accepted all of the allegations in the complaint as true. The issue for the trial court was, then, whether plaintiff could recover or be entitled to relief under any state of facts provable under the claim. See Pattison v. Ford, 82 N.M. 605, 485 P.2d 361 (Ct.App. 1971).
Plaintiffs filed their complaint on May 16, 1973, alleging in pertinent part that on June 20, 1969 defendant performed tubal ligation surgery upon the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Mantz v. FollingstadNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lakeman v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
- Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hinkle v. HargensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Catherine B. Ramsey v. Charles H. Culpepper and the Farmington Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Kern Ex Rel. Kern v. St. Joseph Hospital, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Peralta v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.